![]() [October 10th Membership Statistics: [23 Members (15 General) were present at the October Meeting. This constituted 66% Corporate Membership (4l% of the General Membership).]
|
MENTOR OF ARISIA Issue 36 November 1993 (AND NOW A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR :)Executive Board Meeting October 10th 1993 The meeting was called to order by the president, Joe Ross, at 1:25 p.m. In Attendance: Joseph Ross, President; Nicholas Shectman, Vice-President; Allan Kent, Treasurer; Edward Dooley, Clerk; Sheila Oranch, ConChair '95; also present: Rob Bazemore, Donna Dube, Donald Eastlake IV, Donald Eastlake III, Jill Eastlake, David Fassett, Walter Kahn, Sheri Kaplowitz, 'Zanne Labonville, Noel Rosenberg, Pat Vandenberg There were no corrections to the minutes of the September E-Board Meeting. The Executive Board's first order of business was to discuss the matter of the 1500 cap and what happens when we hit it. The Long Range Planning Committee's report of their meeting on 2/28/93 was discussed. From their report, the LRP had discussed giving the ConChair the discretion to increase the size of the convention cap one time up to a predetermined amount that the division heads felt the could absorb. The point were raised that it would be unfair to turn away persons who had traveled a long distance. It was also pointed out that if we hit the limit and turned people away it was quite likely that they would still remain at the con-- wandering the facility without a badge, and presenting a possible security risk to the convention. An additional question was just how was the body count calculated. Did one day memberships count into the overall 1500 number? Did child memberships, Fans of the Future, Fastrack, Child in Tow, Necessary Companions figure into the figure and should they? |
People are requested to use their discretion when calling the officers listed above, especially at their places of employment. For up-to-date information by computer/modem, call Arisia BBS: 617/364-1576 or 617/364-3343. Therefore it was decided that the E-Board would recommend to the membership that: o The organization would monitor how early in the Con we appear to be exceeding the limit. o The ConChair would be allowed to increase the membership cap by 200 before convening the E-Board in order to increase it further. o The ConChair would consult the Division Heads, if possible, when approaching the limit with special attention to Member Services and Security (Operations). A motion for Line Item Transfers had been submitted to the president which gave more authority to the ConChair than was comfortable. The point was raised concerning budgets in the past, particularly with 1992, that at some points no one knew what their particular budget was (and therefore over spent), if a situation like that occurred again, and a line transfer was made, we would be in serious trouble. |
The president presented his own version of the
Line Item Transfer, which follows, which the E-Board would recommended
to the membership: 1. The Convention Chairperson may transfer funds from the contingency fund in the convention budget in accordance with Section 9.4 of the Bylaws. 2. The Convention Chairperson may transfer transfer funds between any other line items in the convention budget provided that. (a) the total sums of income and expenditures remains unchanged; (b) the Convention Chairperson shall immediately report each transfer to the president and to the corporate and convention treasurers; and (c) each transfer shall be reported to the E-Board. Any transfer may be suspended or overruled in accordance with Section 6.5 of the Bylaws. A motion was made that ARISIA should endorse both the 1998 and the 2001 WorldConsm bids. It was decided that such an endorsement would not be exhibiting favoritism to either bid, and that by endorsing both means we are actually endorsing a BOSTON WorldConsm. Therefore, it was the recommendation of the E-Board to the membership: To endorse both the 1998 and the 2001 BOSTON WorldConsm bids. Sheila Oranch announced that she had asked Ken Knabbe to be her Convention Treasurer for ARISIA '95. Ken stated that he would act as Convention Treasurer if he had the assistance of Mike DiGenio on the finer points. Ken was assured that many persons in the organization had Treasury experience, and assistance would be given. With this understanding, Ken Knabbe accepted Sheila's offer. Therefore, the president appointed Ken Knabbe to the position of Convention Treasurer for ARISIA '95 (Congratulations Ken!) |
The matter of the pun fine was
discussed. Several members of the E-Board felt uncomfortable with the
idea of the fine, even though it would raise money for the grant fund. As one member of the board stated, it penalized the quiet members or persons who do not find it easy to pun. As another member put it, when it was first introduced (at NESFA) it was fun for a nickel, but when the price went up he was careful on how often he punned. And yet another said they would rather reward witticism with some sort of point system rather than penalize. A negative feeling seemed evenly distributed among the board. Therefore, it was the E-Board's recommendation to the membership: Not to accept the pun fine. Another item from the Long Range Planning report of last February was the need for a computer to the organization. Phi (Nick Shectman) volunteered a computer and other equipment which was suited to run LENNOX (I believe this was stated as a gateway to the Internet--editor), but was not suited for data capture. It was pointed out that there are several areas of the organization (both at-con and during the rest of the year) that require the use of a computer. Areas such as the database, registration, and the clerk need a computer. It was decided that a Computer Needs Committee would be established. The question of membership compensation was raised concerning reimbursement of memberships (from '93). (As per corporate policy, members who worked 18 hours/GOPHERS and 18.2 hours/STAFF received comp memberships to next year's con ('94).) People were reminded to keep track of their hours, turn in their hours in order to obtain their comp, and so that registration would have a record of who got comp'd and be able to notify people. The clerk informed the E-Board that he had received from Ted Atwood an estimate of the cost to rewire the ART SHOW's electrical and lighting requirements. The break down of the equipment needed was: |
$ 75.00 for 32 mounting plates that will allow proper adjustment of the lights ($2.98 ea) A total estimated cost of $330. Mention was also made of the need to allocate funds for the repainting of the panels. However, as we are moving into the autumn it was not felt as crucial to begin the repainting as we would not have many good weekends left to complete it. Therefore, it was the recommendation of the E-Board to allocate $400 to start the overhaul of the ART SHOW electrical. Concerning the location of the December and January meeting locations, it was decided that the December 5th meeting would be scheduled at the NESFA clubhouse and that we would hold off selecting a sight for the January 8th meeting. January 8th is a Saturday, and on street parking at the NESFA clubhouse is difficult (parking meters). The president also appointed to the Budget Committee both the 1995 ConChair, Sheila Oranch, and the 1995 Convention Treasurer, Ken Knabbe. The Clerk raised the question concerning who received Arisia's copies of the newsletters we receive from other organizations. The president explained that it had been decided that Jim Belfiore would receive the copies as the then clerk already received his own. It was noted that this could be changed if necessary. No action was taken. As a final matter, it was confirmed that the official Corporate address is still Pat McCormacks, and it is still alright with Pat that it remain so. The meeting adjourned at 2:30. |
(GETTING DOWN TO BUSINESS.)
In Attendance: Rob Bazemore, Ed Dooley, Donna Dube (RS),
Mark Dulcey,
Donald Eastlake IV (RS), Donald Eastlake III, Jill Eastlake, David
Fassett, Jeff Jordan (RS), |
General membership: Donna M. Dube Jeff Jordan Patrick McCormack Chris Palmer Noel Rosenberg In accordance with the Bylaws, this motion was automatically tabled to the next meeting. NOTICE OF MEMBERSHIP TRANSFER THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS WILL BE RED SHIRTED AT THE END OF THE NOVEMBER CORPORATE MEETING ON 11/6/93 IF THEY DO NOT ATTEND: HEATHER COONIN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1.2 OF THE BYLAWS, AN AUTOMATIC TRANSFER MAY BE WAIVED BY THE MEMBERSHIP FOR CAUSE, WHICH CAUSE MAY BE STATED IN THE MINUTES REMEMBER: It is YOUR responsibility to check off your name on the attendance in order to count as attending a meeting. (FROM THE DESK OF "EL SUPREMO"...)President's Report:A. Joseph Ross reporting: The president reported that he had received and accepted the resignation of Walter Kahn from Corporate Merchandising. Walter sited that he was overextended in other areas and need to cut back. Joe announced that anyone who wished to fill the vacancy should see him.The president announced that he had appointed Ken Knabbe as the Convention Treasurer for ARISIA '95. VOTED: To approve the appointment of Ken Knabbe as Convention Treasurer for ARISIA '95 by acclamation. |
The president also announced that he
was appointing Sheila Oranch, ConChair '95, and Ken Knabbe, Convention
Treasurer '95, to the Budget Committee. VOTED: To approve the appointments of Sheila Oranch and Ken Knabbe to the Budget Committee by acclamation. The president further announced that he was appointing Nicholas Shectman to the newly formed Computer Needs Committee. VOTED: To approve the appointment of Nicholas Shectman to the Computer Needs Committee by acclamation. Vice-President's Report:GRANT COMMITTEE &COMPUTER NEEDS COMMITTEE:Nicholas Shectman reporting:The vice-president reported that he was waiting on an answer to who was allowed to obtain money from the Grant Committee (the question was raised at the last meeting if only fellow non-profits, individuals, or other organizations could qualify for grant money). Joe Ross informed Nick that he had not had the opportunity to look into the specifics of the matter as yet. Nick also announced that he had (computer) equipment which he was willing to allow the corporation to use. Either for the net or other areas. Treasurer's Report:BUDGET COMMITTEE:Allan Kent reporting:The treasurer reported that the Budget Committee had not met, but the Treasurer's Report of the financial standing of the corporation was written--unfortunately he had not been able to have it copied in time for the meeting (the clerk received a copy of the report on October 12th, see appendix I). Checks had been written and were in the mail for people waiting on money from us. |
Clerk's Report/DATABASE COMMITTEE:Ed Dooley reporting:The clerk reported that there were now 102 more days until ARISIA '94. Everyone was asked to sign in, and for persons joining during the meeting the rate was $22, after the meeting the rate dropped to $20. As was made quite clear, Mentor, had undergone a style transformation (a few persons asked that a different italics font either be used, or dropped--hopefully the present italic font used is better). As had been pointed out by several persons (both mundane & fan) the newsletter of any organization, while sometimes under-rated by insiders, is the most visible representation to an outsider of what goes on. A good newsletter reflects a healthy organization. In continuing the overhaul of Mentor, the clerk urged people to begin submitting stuff. Art Work, articles, gripes, etc. We got a lot of creative people in the organization. Finally, the clerk asked that people remember that it is corporate policy that persons making a report submit the basics in writing. Too much goes on at any meeting trying to track the ongoing changes to various reports in addition to getting the gist of the basics on the fly. Membership surveys have gone out. All members are urged to return their surveys. No survey, no listing in membership roster. As for the Database, the committee has not had an opportunity to formally sit down. An open work session is scheduled for October 19th, at Pat Vandenberg and Allan Kent's home. The items that the Chairperson of the committee set as a loose agenda are: I. While not in the scope of the project, the corporation should give serious consideration to acquiring a computer to run the database on when it is completed (hardware problem). II. Developing a long term time line stating when specific applications would be developed and brought online. |
III. Overall
approach to problem:(a) The completed database will probably live on one machine with all application systems interacting together.IV. People should be working on their "wish list" and get them to me ASAP so that they can be reviewed. People should be reviewing their own paper systems to see what works, and to give us an idea of what they would like their screens and reports to look like. V. These goals may be optimistic. (...TO THOSE BEHIND THE LENS.)COMMITTEE REPORTS:ConCom '94.Jim Belfiore reporting:Jim Belfiore was unable to attend the corporate meeting, reporting for him were Sheila Oranch and Pat Vandenberg. An apology to Jeff Jordan for the lack of a telephone number for the BBS in the recent mailing. This item will be corrected in the next mailing. It was reported that Jenny Drysdale had resigned from her position on the ConCom, and Pat Vandenberg gave a quick summary of what occurred at the 12 noon ComCon meeting. |
In brief: o Program book deadline is November 3rd. o Money obtained from the hotel is for lighting and decorating of the Castle (i.e. chairs)--the place is usually bare. o Kim Van Auken is producing art work for the badges which will be difficult to reproduce. o Investigation is being done into different types of badge holders which might be more secure that what we have used. o Sheila had ad information (SELL-SELL-SELL), and stressed that certain advertisers would be offered an opportunity to place coupons in the AT-CON newsletter. o Kevin Fallon is loaning a label printer and bar coder to the con. o Noel Rosenberg is accepting sign requests. The deadline is now (the person who is actually doing the signs for us has returned to school--a major ART school where he has access to a lot of neat stuff. If you wait you probably won't get what you could have!). o A work session is scheduled on the 19th (to run concurrently with the DATABASE MEETING) to do corrections on the mailings that have returned. A request was made to people who distribute items to several people to indicate (in some fashion) who it had already been given to in order to cut down on duplication of effort. ConCom '95:Sheila Oranch reporting: It was announced by Sheila that she had asked Ken Knabbe to serve as her treasurer and Ken had accepted.The membership was told that an invitation had been sent to a writer to be GOH, and Sheila hoped that she should have a reply by Christmas. Also, the artist she had selected as GOH was pending approval. She also stressed that persons running particular tracts of the Con should consider "special guest" for their area who (in keeping with her theme of diversity) who be minor GOH's for a particular tract Sheila mentioned that for '95 she was seriously considering making a requirement of BABYSITTING/Member Services that a pager be issued to parents at a cost of $10 (or so) to insure prompt return and retrieval of children. Sheila pointed out that the off time for the people in Babysitting is very small. One late parent can wipe out someone's dinner break. |
If the pager is lost, so is the
returnable portion of the deposit, and the person is liable for
the cost of the pager. Some discussion was given to possibly making
this available to parents at '94, but it was pointed out that as
we have not published this in any of our flyers that it would be unfair to slap this fee on people expecting babysitting without previous notification. It may be instituted voluntarily. LONG RANGE PLANING:Pat Vandenberg reporting:Pat reported that in regards to storage, where we currently are looks good. Whether we can take advantage of a discount for early payment is being looked into. Corporate Benefits:Sheila Oranch reporting: Sheila reported that she need two things. The first was that she need someone who could make daytime phone calls (No one volunteered),"Well, Sheila said, "that sort of ends my report!" Corporate Merchandising:Walter Kahn reporting: Walter had nothing to report, initially. However, he did report later that the T-Shirt Samples sent to ConFransico are missing. If anyone has any information on them, they should either contact Joe Ross or the new merchandise representative. |
(AND HERE BE DRAGONS...)OLD BUSINESS:NONE!NEW BUSINESS:VOTED: To approve the E-Board's recommendation concerning what to do if we reach the 1500 person cap which was to:o The organization would monitor how early in the Con we appear to be exceeding the limit. The recommendation of the E-Board concerning line transfers was discussed. Some members felt that it should be the authority of the Division Heads and not the ConChair to shift funds. As a past Division Head stated, he always asked for that authority as part of his budget submission. It was further felt that the ConChair should not be able to shift as it showed either poor planning or greed. (During all this the pizza showed up and several people asked if we could adjourn temporarily. So...) The meeting adjourned for food at 3:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 4:15 p.m. After much discussion the final policy was eventually hammered out. 1. The Convention Chairperson may transfer funds from the contingency fund in the convention budget in accordance with Section 9.4 of the Bylaws. |
2. A Division Head, with the
approval of the Convention Chairman, may transfer transfer funds
between any other line items in the convention budget within that
division provided that(a) the total sums of income and expenditures remains unchanged;3. Transfers of funds, between divisions, may be made, with the approval of the E-Board, after the last Corporate Meeting before the Convention. The membership: VOTED: to approve this policy, as amended. A motion was made that ARISIA should endorse both the 1998 and the 2001 WorldConsm bids. It was decided that such an endorsement would not be exhibiting favoritism to either bid, and that by endorsing both means we are actually endorsing a BOSTON WorldConsm. Therefore, it was the recommendation of the E-Board to the membership: To endorse both the 1998 and the 2001 BOSTON WorldConsm bids. The membership: VOTED: To endorse both the 1998 & 2001 BOSTON WorldConsm bids. (Good Luck to both in their bidding!!) Upon the recommendation of the E-Board against adopting a Pun Fine the membership: VOTED: to not adopt a pun fine for meetings. Concerning the request from the ART SHOW for funds to rework their lighting and electrical needs: $ 75.00 for 32 mounting plates that will allow proper adjustment of the lights ($2.98 ea) $ 10.00 for black plastic electrical tape. $ 80.00 for 10 25' extension cord 14/3 $ 165.00 estimated cost for lighting repairs and redesign. |
A total estimated cost of $330. The E-Board recommended to the membership that $400 be allocated for the work. The membership: VOTED: to approve the allocation. ANNOUNCEMENTS:[Members are reminded that reports and announcements should be submitted in written form so that they may be accurately reported on in Mentor--especially in the next few hectic months. The clerk would appreciate if more members would remember this, thank you.A request was made for an ONLINE flyer for the Bulletin Board for ARISIA '94. 200 to 300 large manila envelopes are presently available. Anyone mailing anything requiring one should see Phi. Persons going to PHILCON (11/12 thru 11/14) should be aware that volunteers are needed for the party. If you are interested in helping out--see Phi. NJAC has been canceled. The next ConCom will be at Pat and Allan's on 10/26/93 at 7 p.m. Jeff is currently working on a gateway to the BBS from Compuserve. At present it is only one-way. A request was made for a one page explanation for the Convention Program Book on "HOW TO GET ON TO THE (BULLETIN) BOARD" It was noted that NESFA tends to use GENIE. Arisia tends to use INTERNET. Jeff made an appeal for people to start posting things to the Bulletin Board (MENTOR, ConCom News, etc) Membership Surveys are due back--NOW. WORLDCON is a service mark of the World Science Fiction Society, an unincorporated literary society. |
UPCOMING EVENTS:OCTOBER: 10/26/93 ARISIA ConCom Meeting at 7 p.m. at the home of Pat Vandenberg and Allan Kent, 15 Park Avenue Extension, Arlington MA. (Contributions for refreshments welcome!) NOVEMBER: 11/6/93 ARISIA CORPORATE MEETING (NOTE: THIS IS A SATURDAY) at 2 p.m. at the home Pat Vandenberg and Allan Kent, 15 Park Ave Extension, Arlington. The E-Board will meet at 1 p.m. DECEMBER: 12/5/93 ARISIA CORPORATE MEETING at 2 p.m. at NESFA. E-Board will meet at 1 p.m. JANUARY: 1/8/94 ARISIA CORPORATE MEETING at 2 p.m. --location to be announced. 1/20/94 Move In and Set Up at the BOSTON PARK PLAZA HOTEL AND CASTLE for ARISIA '94 1/21/94 ARISIA '94 through 1/23/94 at the BOSTON PARK PLAZA HOTEL AND CASTLE 1/24/94 Tear down and Move Out at the BOSTON PARK PLAZA HOTEL AND CASTLE for ARISIA '94 FEBRUARY: 2/18/94 BOSKONE 31 through 2/20/94 at the Sheraton Tara, Framingham Please notify the CLERK of any upcoming events or meetings which should go into this schedule. Thank you. |
RE:[A recent posting to the BBS was brought to my attention at the last corporate meeting. As I have asked for submissions, the author of the posting said that it might serve as a place to start, and that future postings in the public area of the board might serve as filler. It is reprinted here as it appeared on the board.] FROM: Pat McCormack Sep-24-93 9:49:52TO: Joseph Ross SUBJECT: ELECTIONS Actually, I don't find that too surprising at all. Phi is a very good person to throw into the Eboard. It might help you to regain some of the credibility you lost goimost[sic] of the people I've talked to since then were amazed and appalled. Not just at the decision (Most of them consider Sheila too big a flake to work for.), but the process. To paraphrase most of the comments, you had a short-handed, brain-dead Eboard made up of one real officer, one newly appointed officer, and one officer who was only waiting around to screw things up before retiring. Then the appointee was brought out for a rubber-stamp without anyone knowing that there were better options available. Granted, some of that is slightly inaccurately. However, the points that I do agree on are that: 1) You should have delayed the decision until you had the full Eboard. Given the current process of appointment, Sheila was effectively being selected by as little as 2 people. Having to get a majority of 3 is better than having to get a majority of 2. 2) Given that 2 of the officers you did have were "temporary", it might have been best to leave the entire matter to the next slate of officers. 3) The system of appointed conchairs has just shown its greatest weakness. The corporation might really want to consider changing the by-laws to make it an elected position. The entire process was perceived to have an air of backroom skulduggery about it, from not releasing the names of the candidates at the start to the set of officers who did the appointment in the end. Well, you can take this for what its worth, considering I'm officially not even a member of the corporation anymore. Not so much that I don't want to be, I just lost track of time at work on Sunday and didn't remember to leave for the meeting until it was too late anyway. I'll get to the October or November meeting and start getting my voting rights back then. |
Oh, yeah. I really did mean to post
this publicly, since so many people are saying behind closed doors, we might as well get it out in the open where it can be discussed by everyone. FROM: Joseph Ross Sep-30-93 23:39:58TO: Pat McCormack Subject: Elections Phi's election was surprising only in that it was unexpected. While I knew that Phi was considering running, he had not announced, and I did not know that Rob would withdraw in his favor. I think Phi will be a fine addition to the E-Board. The process of appointment this year was the first time that we had an actual selection to make. That means that we were doing certain things for the first time and had to learn as we went. While I was reluctant to officially announce the candidates, only because no policy had been set, the candidates were well known. In fact, most or all had announced themselves publicly. Policy has been adopted for the future in favor of announcing candidates. Also, we didn't realize that we would need to interview candidates, since we knew everyone. Next year, I will make sure that interviewing is planned and announced (Only one candidate was not interviewed this year, and, for other reasons, she really wasn't likely to be appointed this year.). We learned quite a bit from these interviews. In fact, Sheila convinced us that she was not the flake some people thought. You, also, convinced us that our misgivings about you were not a problem. While all the Board members who voted chose Sheila, you were a close second in the minds of all. We were also constrained by the fact that it is really important to appoint the con chair early, and we were already a month later than we had originally planned because of the problems with Mentor. The remaining criticisms are unfair to Heather, whose commitment to Arisia is strong and long-standing, and Ed, whose position was by appointment, but who was elected to the position at that meeting (I think before we actually made the appointment.). In any event, I think Sheila will make a good con chair, arid I hope that we have |
learned enough to do the process better in the
future. But, I can't see how the outcome would have been different by a different process. FROM: Pat McCormack Oct-04-93 02:08:48TO: Joseph Ross Subject: RE: Elections JR> While I was reluctant to officially announce the JR> candidates, only because no policy had been set, the Hey, Joe, it's the President's duty and prerogative to set policy when there is none covering a situation. JR> candidates were well known. In fact, most or all JR> had announced themselves publicly. I wouldn't say WELL known. Yes, most of the candidates announced publicly, but those announcements didn't necessarily spread to the entire membership. Only an announcement in the Mentor can guarantee the entire membership being informed. Well, Joe, I think you missed a major point of my letter. This wasn't about my participation in the process, or about my losing out to Sheila. People were saying these things in private and I thought they needed to get said in public. When things like this stay in the closet, they cause problems further down the line. Some loud mouth needed to set them out in the open. I think everyone will agree that I have a long reputation for being among the first to say controversial things in public. JR> We were also constrained by the fact that it is really JR> important to appoint the con chair early, and we JR> were already a month later than we had originally JR> planned because of the problems with Here I disagree with you. You should have allowed a month between appointment and seeking ratification of your appointment. My reason for saying this is that all other major decisions by the corporation are all automatically tabled until the next meeting. there were good reasons the by-laws were written to make that happen. First, you avoid looking like you're 'slipping something past" the membership. Second, you allow the membership time for discussion and contemplation. The appointment of the Conchair is arguably the single most important decision the corporation makes each year. It isn't something that should be rushed through. That's |
why I suggested the corporation might want to move towards electing the conchair, rather than appointing it. If you want to keep it as an appointment process, I would suggest the following changes in procedure: 1) The Eboard should announce its choice and then wait one month before putting it to a vote by the membership. 2) The Eboard should foster discussion about the choice by publishing it opinions of all the candidates. Yeah, I know a scream for privacy will be raised about the last one. We want to avoid hurt feelings, etc. but I'll put it to you that the current process acts as a rubber stamp. When there is no discussion, there's very little chance that dissenting votes will be cast. People will not vote something down if there appears to be no alternative. Only when there are choices and a forum for open discussion will you have a chance at getting an informed decision from the membership. Hell, you didn't even ASK if there was any discussion about the appointment. (If I remember Robert's Rules correctly, ratification of an appointment is not a privileged motion that must be voted on without discussion.) JR> Mentor. The remaining criticisms are unfair to JR> Heather, whose commitment to Arisia is strong and JR> long-standing, and Ed, whose position was by JR> appointment, but who was elected to the position at JR> that meeting (I think before we actually made the JR> appointment.). Well, you might think them unfair. I might think them unfair. You have been in political situations before, Joe. You should know that perception is often as important as fact, if not more so. (Pardon me as I step into the role of Devil's Advocate and show you the worst case scenario for the appointment process.) From some points of view, the decision looked like it was rushed into simply to allow Heather her chance to affect it. Yes, we technically elected Ed before the Eboard made its decision. But, you strayed from established procedure here. You opened the meeting, got him elected so you would have quorum of officers, then adjourned the meeting to hold an Eboard meeting to make your appointment. All this was done while another member of the Eboard was out of town, rather than waiting for him to return. Taken together, in a jaundiced light, this all looks kind of sleazy. That's what you have to deal with, Joe. The facts may be something else entirely, but some people are perceiving it in a manner similar to what I described. I'm sure there are people who are going to take this whole bit I've said as sour grapes. I hope you know me well enough to realize that is not my motivation here, and that the things I have brought up are worthy of |
discussion and consideration. FROM: Joseph Ross Oct-09-93 00:27:44TO: Pat McCormack SUBJECT: Re: Elections First, I have no objection to the discussion being carried out in the open. In fact, I think it is healthy. Second, the membership knew that the appointment of con chair was going to be done at that meeting, and the identities of the candidates was widely known. Next year, the identities of the candidates will be announced officially. I believe that is sufficient notice for all members to know what is coming before the meeting. Third, I believe that I asked for discussion before putting the matter to a vote. This is from memory, though, and minutes do not show much detail. Fourth, I started the meeting when I did because we were already about half an hour late starting the meeting. We went through all reports before recessing. We did also elect the clerk, and I did choose to do that before making the appointment. But the fact of the matter is, it didn't make any difference. From the point when he was appointed interim clerk, Ed Dooley was a member of the E-Board under the bylaws. Further, there was no one else who wanted the job. I suppose I can't win on that one. Before, you criticized us for not waiting until we had an election. Then, when it was pointed out that we had the election first, you criticized us for that. Fourth, we originally planned to appoint the con chair in June (as we did last year with Jim). We were two months behind because of the Mentor hiatus. We managed to compress the process a bit, so that we appointed in July. This was based on the feeling that the con chair needed as much time as possible to get organized, a point that we have discussed for several years. Finally, while there are certain ways that I hope we will do this better next year, based on the experience (and, hopefully, we won't have a Mentor hiatus to impede things), it sounds like nothing more than sour grapes to call the process sleazy. We were feeling our way with |
a process that was new to us, and
did our best under the circumstances. You may criticize our actions all you want, but there was nothing sinister about our motives. RE: Between a Rock and a Hard PlaceEd DooleyBreath everyone! About right now a lot of members areprobably questioning my sanity in all this. Am I crazy? Do I want to throw gasoline on a fire? To be honest, this editorial is an after thought. A colleague, who isn't a member of Arisia, or any other fan organization, told me I had a responsibility to mediate. Wonderful. Well, here goes nothing. Looking back, and I don't have to look back far, this situation has probably been brewing since before I became a corporate member (February 1992). I've listen to the various stories circulating. Who did what to who. Why that person can't stand someone else and so forth. I've also heard from people how professional we are. How impressed some organizations are with our performance, and how we appear to be one of the fast growing cons on this coast. What's happened to the team spirit, people? I didn't join the organization because of who the con chair is--try not to faint guys, its nothing personal! I'm not impressed by the posturing, or the egos--especially since some people are telling me I'M developing one. If it comes to that, I'll resign my position. I have no ties to anyone in this organization, and I can cut the cord at a moments notice. In short, even I don't want the power of this position, but someone has to make the decisions. You can either have someone who wants to be in the spot light, and gets nothing done. Or you can have someone who will work behind the scenes getting the job done. None of this will matter 100 years from now. I don't believe that Sheila is the issue. |
What I do think what is happening is that we are losing focus of what this organization is about. Both Joe and Pat had good points. The most important one being that if we sweep this under the carpet it will be worse later on. We are always quick to state that Arisia is about advocacy and innovation. We are less quick to admit that we don't always agree that we disagree. To some its more important that things look nice, healthy and happy. This is not a popularity contest. If we wish to keep that sharp, fresh edge, we have to be willing to work with one another, even if it is with someone who appears controversial. We have to be willing to take a chance on new ideas that we haven't done before; or old ideas that didn't appear feasible. At least we will have tried. There is no room here for negative energy. Its counter productive. In closing, I really hope that people will sit back and consider this problem and discuss it in a calm fashion. No ego posturing. No patronizing. Listen to what the other person is saying. Communicate. The worst threat to this, or any organization, are egos, personal agendas, and misperceptions. |